Hello everyone,
This message will address the current situation.
Before beginning, I will lay out who this message is for, who it is not for, and its purpose:
-
This message is for those who are Hyperian but may be unaware of the details of what is going on and for those who may be on the fence due to the intentional spread of confusion by our detractors.
-
This message is not for Illuminists. I do not want, nor do I intend, to convince Illuminists of anything. They have chosen their path.
-
The purpose of this message is to show exactly what is going on and that the AC authors have attempted to deceive everyone through an intentional campaign of lies, intimidation, conditioning, and confusion.
The intention of this message is to provide irrefutable evidence that the AC are liars and manipulators. This is my statement that stands against any wild claim they have generated, or will generate in the future, about me or Hyperianism. Whatever absurdity they come up with would have no weight because this message will show they will fabricate anything to get what they want.
This message is intended to provide evidence for you to judge the situation for yourself. This situation is the litmus test for rationality and morality. View what I have to say and the evidence I provide, compare it to their material, and decide.
Contrast the styles of communication. I will be providing evidence and logic for my position while they rant and rage with a mountain of ad hominems, slurs, threats, harassment, blatant contradictions, lies, and libelous statements. They repeatedly release material that jeopardizes my health and safety, and the health and safety of others.
Ask yourself why they need to stoop so low. I will do no such thing as truth and evidence are on my side.
The AC authors have made claims about me and Hyperianism. They have done so in a book of over 800 pages in length and continue to write more posts daily. They will continue to do this. Their claims become increasingly deranged as time goes on. I will not devote my time to responding to every one of their outlandish claims. Even if I did, they would simply generate more ridiculous claims. They are intentionally attempting to waste my time. I have better things to do, such as focusing on creating a better world.
I will begin by giving a brief overview of the situation, and then break it down in detail.
The Situation:
The AC claims that Hyperianism is a “woke liberal” movement because we support the LGBTQ+ community and minorities, promote diversity and individuality, and are nonviolent.
Because of this, they are suddenly claiming that I don’t give credit for ontological mathematics and that I assert that I am its creator. This is provably false. As I have said in a previous statement, anyone who watches my livestreams knows that I repeatedly bring up the books by Mike Hockney and Dr. Thomas Stark (and sometimes Cody Newman) as resources for ontological mathematics. There are many replays on my channel where this can be verified. They are also credited with gratitude as pioneers of OM on the first page of my book on OM. They are also referenced multiple times on the Hyperianism website with links to purchase their books as resources for ontological mathematics.
Summary: They do not like Hyperianism because we support the LGBTQ+ community and minorities, promote diversity and individuality, and are nonviolent. Always keep this in mind and ask yourself what kind of group would viciously attack us on these grounds. To “justify” their attacks on us they are claiming that I do not give credit for ontological mathematics and have plagiarized Illuminism. I will show this is false and they have publicly said that I am not a plagiarist and have congratulated me for the publication of my book on ontological mathematics.
Their False Narrative:
Since their claim of plagiarism is proven false and their own works openly state it is false (I will be providing the evidence for this in a subsequent section), they are claiming that there was a “contract” between us that I broke. This is false. There is no such contract.
The current false narrative they are spinning is that I was supposed to be spreading an extremist and radicalizing ideology and that I have duped everyone into thinking I had their support. This is false.
They claim that I deceived everyone and am a traitor by promoting “woke liberal” ideas. These “woke liberal” ideas being support for the LGBTQ+ community and minorities, self-expression, individuality, nonviolence, and diversity. I have always, clearly and explicitly, supported these ideals in my work.
The Actuality:
What follows is an overview of what actually happened.
I was spreading ontological mathematics through Hyperianism, which the AC were well aware of and had been supportive of this for years. In fact, the entire point of Hyperianism was that it was supposed to be different from Illuminism since they said online Illuminism had failed.
They were so approving of Hyperianism and my work that they wrote an entire book in support of me and Hyperianism called “Take Them to the Morgue” by Joe Dixon and congratulated me for my book on ontological mathematics in “The Mandarin Effect” also by Joe Dixon. In their book, “The Cosmic Jest” by Mark Romel, they explicitly say that I am not a plagiarist and that any such claim is ludicrous.
Keep in mind that Hyperianism has always been supportive of LGBTQ+, diversity, self-expression, minorities, and individuality. This is clear from my videos over the years, my posts, and my books. The AC continued to be explicitly supportive over the years, all the way to August of 2020 when they told me I was doing a fantastic job and that all my hard work was paying off.
Three months later, in November of 2020, they suddenly began to pressure me to make Hyperianism more radical. Think about that for a moment. They were supportive and positive about Hyperianism all the way up until August of 2020, just three months before they started pressuring me.
Keep in mind, at the time, I had no idea of their transphobic and anti-diversity stance. I thought becoming more radical meant being more critical of the ideology of Islam, for example. I told them that this wasn’t possible as my social media accounts would get deleted and jeopardize the movement of Hyperianism.
The exchange between us was not hostile in any way at this point. It was friendly and matter of fact. They told me they understood my position and that risking accounts could be disadvantageous and that they would think about possible solutions.
They came up with proposed solutions. At the time, they had a Facebook page called The Locust Party. One of their proposed solutions was to make a post on the Locust Party page that Hyperianism and TLP differed on politics since Hyperianism was more liberal. I suggested we take that solution. They said that the post wouldn’t come across as flattering no matter how much they tried to dress it up in nice language but that they would say that I had to behave in a “liberal” way due to the constraints of social media.
Once again, the exchange between us did not have a hostile tone in any way. It was friendly and matter of fact. The impression given was that Hyperianism and TLP would not be enemies, but that we differed in strategy and so should both continue for the same goal without hindering one another. In fact, the message was so “friendly” that they said they were going to send me a draft of the post they intended to make so that I could look it over, make sure I was happy with it, and could suggest amendments. I agreed to this. I thought this was a good direction since I was becoming uncomfortable with how their posts were becoming increasingly radical, going so far as to praise China’s “re-education” camps.
That is the last I heard from them. They never sent me a draft of the post they were going to make, nor did they contact me in any way, and the TLP Facebook page was eventually deleted. I was left completely in the dark by them. There was NO impression that they were hostile or wanted me to stop or anything of that nature. I was left with the impression that there was no problem, that we were just adopting different strategies for the same goal. That is how they left it with me—waiting on an email from them that they never sent.
The next time I would hear from them would be almost two years later, indirectly, in their massively hateful book, “Without the Mob, There is no Circus” by David Sinclair, which is explicitly transphobic, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-diversity, and anti-individuality. In this book, they attack me as being a “woke liberal” and traitor.
Does this make sense? Does this seem rational? At any time, they could have emailed me. The ball was in their court. They were explicitly supportive over the years, and Hyperianism didn’t change. So, why did they do this? None of it makes any sense. After all, didn’t we have the same goal? Even if they didn’t like my methods, wouldn’t more exposure to their material through me recommending their books aid their cause? The answer to why they suddenly became hostile towards Hyperianism is that their vision for the future is completely different than what they make it seem to be. This is exposed through their hateful stances in the Sinclair book. They are used to controlling people who carry out their commands without question.
I am not some lackey or puppet. I am no one’s servant. I have always been focused on world change as an independent creator and movement founder. I was already doing so and would have continued to do so on my own even if I never heard of them. Changing the world has always been my goal. However, I thought aligning with them would allow us to accomplish what I thought were common goals.
They intended to manipulate me, and when they discovered they couldn’t, they became enraged.
Summary:
Hyperianism and Illuminism have always been different. That was the acknowledged intention and has been stated in public many times. I have always been supportive of the LGBTQ+ community and minorities, diversity, self-expression, and individuality. This is clear from my books, posts, and videos over the years. During this time, the authors were extremely supportive, wrote a book in support, explicitly said all claims that I was a plagiarist were false, and congratulated me on my book on ontological mathematics. They were positive about Hyperianism as far as August 2020. Three months later they pressured me to become radical. I did not. A seemingly friendly plan was made to make a post on the Locust Party Facebook page stating our political difference. Nothing was hostile and we were not enemies. They never sent me the email (which they said they would) containing the draft of the post for my review and amendments, nor any email for that matter, and left me in the dark. Almost two years later, without ever contacting me and letting me know of any changes, they published a libelous, hate-filled book, exposing their discriminatory intentions, and they lied about me and Hyperianism in an attempt to shut me down.
All this was done because of my support for the LGBTQ+ community, minorities, diversity, self-expression, and individuality.
This has been a brief overview of the situation. I will now break down each element in detail.
Accusations of Not Giving Credit:
With the publishing of their book, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus” by David Sinclair on July 26, 2022, the AC makes the claims that I do not give credit for ontological mathematics, that I claim I created it, and that I am a plagiarizer. They have never expressed these claims before the publishing of this book. Why are they making these claims if they aren’t true? In that publication, they claim Hyperianism is a “woke liberal” movement and this is their way to discredit me to bring down Hyperianism.
Their claim that I do not give credit for OM is provably false and I have never claimed that I created OM. That is absurd. Claiming OM is like attempting to claim “gravity.” No one owns or created gravity, and no one owns or created OM.
Anyone who watches my livestreams knows that I repeatedly bring up the books by Mike Hockney and Dr. Thomas Stark (and sometimes Cody Newman) as resources for ontological mathematics. There are many replays on my channel where this can be verified.
They are also credited with gratitude as pioneers of OM on the first page of my book on OM.
They are also referenced multiple times on the Hyperianism website with links to purchase their books as resources for ontological mathematics. This can be verified here:
https://www.iamhyperian.com/ontologicalmathematics/
https://www.iamhyperian.com/omresources/
There are many instances of me and moderators of our Hyperian FB group (no longer active) recommending the God Series repeatedly. Screenshots of this can be provided if necessary.
Furthermore, in their book, “The Mandarin Effect” by Joe Dixon, published July 18, 2019, they congratulated me on the publication of my book on ontological mathematics:
“Things We Like – Congratulations to Morgue on the publication of his new book Ontological Mathematics: The Science of the Future.” – The Mandarin Effect by Joe Dixon
Then there is the claim that I should have credited Illuminism specifically rather than individual authors. This is clearly reaching for straws. When I began Hyperianism, I was told that Illuminism was dead and a failed brand. Thus, reference to Illuminism was to be kept to a minimum, if at all. It wasn’t until later that the AC began to return to the Illuminism project and Illuminati mythos.
On November 02, 2015, the AC claimed they were shutting down and ceasing their project. One of their posts on the AC site at that time read,
“So, it’s the end of the AC era. It plainly outstayed its welcome. It’s time for new voices and visions. For new talents and new creations. Over to you.
Do wonderful things. Make the world sit up and take notice. And never waste your time on the snipers, trolls and saboteurs. Stay well clear of all negative influences, and all petty people.
Nothing has been more shocking to us than the fact that truly vile people managed to take over our online movement. It’s horrific to ponder the things they have got up to in our name. We are truly embarrassed and ashamed. Something must have been very badly amiss with our writings given the ugly, twisted people who came our way and inveigled their way into influential positions.
With the death of the AC site, we have created the opportunity to get rid of all these ghastly people from the online movement once and for all.” – The AC
This is around the time when they ended the God Series and abandoned it to release “the Angel Series” by Jack Tanner. You’ll note that in that series Illuminism is barely mentioned, if at all, and the “Illuminati” mythos, barring a handful of short references, was discarded for an Angel mythos.
Even as late as August 21, 2019, in their book “Base Reality” by Dr. Thomas Stark, they said,
“Online Illuminism is dead. RIP. We do not now have any associations with any Facebook pages, and we do not in fact use Facebook at all. There used to be a scene referred to as “online Illuminism”. No such scene now exists.” – “Base Reality” by Dr. Thomas Stark
At that time, it was very unclear what was going on with the Illuminism project as sometimes they acted as if it was dead and other times they didn’t. Why did I minimally reference Illuminism? Because it was claimed it was dead and I was advised not to by the AC.
If that isn’t proof enough that their accusation of plagiarism is false, they confirm this in their book, “The Cosmic Jest” by Mark Romel, published June 6, 2018:
“People invented conspiracy theories about Morgue and claimed he was a plagiarist – even though we had put his videos on AC/GS (!). Why would we be showing the work of a plagiarist on our website? Are these people literally retarded? Their conspiracy theories – as usual – totally ignore every relevant fact, and have only one aim … to promote their toxic agenda. Fake news! This is the Alt-right way. Just state your conspiracy theory, ignore everything that contradicts it, and trust that its emotional resonance will make everyone agree with it.
So, anyone who dislikes Morgue immediately wants to invent a conspiracy theory. We are not interested in failure, we are interested in success. If we have a failed, dysfunctional audience, we need to replace them with a new, radical, positive, successful audience. We’re not going to get dragged down into the mire – the swamp – of anomic and anarchic types who spend all of their time opposing, and none supporting. These are totally bitter, twisted, negative, useless, failed people, seeking to drag everyone down with them. If you have even one negative thing to say about our work than fuck off. What are you doing here? What are you getting out if it? Why are you bothering? We need to get rid of 100% of the people who post conspiracy theories about our work. None of you is an ally of ours. None of you is on our side. Look in a mirror for once. Look around the world. It’s a vast world. There’s bound to be someone out there that you can fully commit to supporting. Go and find them and support them. Leave us alone. Forget about us.” – “The Cosmic Jest” by Mark Romel
And in another section of the same book, they said:
“Anyone who attacks the work of Morgue should totally dissociate themselves from our work. Such people are just The Trolls: The Next Generation.” – “The Cosmic Jest” by Mark Romel
This was stated in mid-2018 and the core values of Hyperianism have not changed since then. They themselves confirm their accusation is false.
Their claim of not giving credit and plagiarism is verifiably, 100% false.
Additionally, they released an entire book in support of me and Hyperianism by Joe Dixon, called “Take Them to the Morgue” published 2018. Here is just one passage from it:
“No matter how much it grates with all you trolls, Morgue is much smarter than you are. You hate him because of his image. That proves how shallow you are. Like all fools, you imagine you have refuted him. The truth is you haven’t dented him at all. You haven’t even managed to understand him. That’s how far behind the curve you are. Get smart. If you had any sense of the destiny of humanity, of the Coming Race, you would join Hyperianism instead of opposing it. Morgue will succeed not because of the human race but despite it. Humanity always tries to stop special people. It never helps them and it always persecutes them.” – Joe Dixon, Take Them to the Morgue
They removed this book from publication shortly after they published “Without the Mob…” because people on social media began pointing out the blatant contradictions between their two books. The existence of this book and the content can be verified by anyone who purchased the book before it was removed. They try to explain this away by saying this was before I violated some contract. Again, this contract is nonexistent.
Summary: The AC claim I do not give credit for OM and accuse me of plagiarism. This is verifiably false as I have given credit in books, livestreams, this website, and in posts. They congratulated me on the publication of my book on OM, wrote a book in support of me and Hyperianism, and flat out said that I am not a plagiarizer and anyone who claims so is a conspiracy theorist. Not only are their claims provably false but their accusations are in stark contradiction to their previous statements
Wild Claims:
The AC site began to make wild claims about me after the publication of “Without the Mob…” They claimed I could be an undercover FBI agent. They also quoted someone known as NK whom they have written about as being an absolute liar and their enemy. Here is what they said about this person and his followers in their book, Hive Mind-Dreaming by Dr. Thomas Stark:
“[Our book] unmasked the conspirators, it flushed them out. It left them red-faced and raging, shaking their fists futilely at the heavens… To each we say, “…we separate him from the society of all Illuminists, we exclude him from the bosom of our Illuminated Brotherhood and Sisterhood, we declare him excommunicated and anathematized and we judge him condemned to eternal fire with Satan and his angels and all the reprobate…” – Hive Mind-Dreaming by Dr. Thomas Stark
They quoted this person, whom they have said multiple times is a liar, to bring up rumors about me that I am bulimic, have transparent teeth, and am on meth.
Yes… it’s that ridiculous. Their site has been terminated but screenshots can be provided if necessary. Do I even need to address these claims? I am not bulimic and am actively trying to gain weight. Anyone who has attended my patron’s only livestreams have seen me drinking weight gaining shakes for this purpose. I have never done meth in my life. And if I did, so what? I would have no problem telling the public about this. I openly discuss these topics and anyone who has attended my live streams knows this. About the transparent teeth thing… I don’t even know what that means? If anyone can figure that one out let me know.
If any of their claims were true, why wouldn’t they just take me to court? Why are they reduced to these desperate ad hominem attacks, using their followers to harass and troll us, and using quotations from someone they themselves declared a liar, to discredit my character? An undercover FBI agent, who’s bulimic, does meth and has transparent teeth? How anyone can take them seriously and not see through their obvious and badly executed tactics is beyond me.
Another one of their claims is that I am “stealing” people’s money through superchats on YouTube or other common ways of making a living online. Again, this is absurd. No one is required to send superchats and I end every one of my streams by telling people not to feel bad if they can’t. I, like anyone else who streams on YouTube, make my living this way.
Let’s see what the AC authors themselves have said about this. In the book, “Take Them to the Morgue” by Joe Dixon they included a quote that is from someone else who is responding to an accusation by a troll that I take people’s money:
“Many, many people who create videos on a great array of topics on YouTube do so from funds provided by people who appreciate their work. You do realize that every one of the videos Morgue produces professionally are available on YouTube for free to anyone, right? He doesn’t force anyone to pay to gain the knowledge. This is not a hobby. He devotes himself full-time to this movement. So why is it a red flag that he asks for money from people who value his work and want to contribute so that he can continue to make videos? Do you never watch a great informational series on YouTube or use Wikipedia or Khan Academy and think ‘Isn’t this fantastic to have all this available? How is this funded?’ These sites don’t ask for a lot, and I’m happy to send them money because what I get from them is greatly appreciated. But contributing money is completely voluntary.”
To the above quote, the AC authors commented on this with one word: “Exactly.”
The quoted person continued in response to the troll:
“Morgue is the least greedy person I know. Until he finally starting asking for money, he funded everything he did himself. According to you, people should just put things out there for free to everyone without the ability to say, ‘Hey, if you like my work, please consider donating money so I can continue.’ People like YOU are greedy and selfish. You think it’s fine to consume without considering the people who produce the work. And you call Morgue greedy and selfish? Your attitude is a sickness.”
To this, the AC authors responded with: “Well said.”
In the same book, the AC authors themselves respond to a similar troll comment with:
“Thus speaks a totally envious, bitter, anomic individual, an anarchist that despises society. He hasn’t read a word of Morgue’s work. He happily spends a fortune on Starbucks, booze, junk food, Game of Thrones vids, and his smartphone, but won’t spend a cent on a philosopher-artist. He despises artists and thinkers.” – Take Them to the Morgue by Joe Dixon
And in another section they write:
“Morgue deserves so much better. Morgue’s only true supporters are those on Patreon. All the rest are just along for the ride. They’re dilettantes, those that flirt with something but show no real commitment or knowledge. They don’t help Morgue. They just pretend to.” –Take Them to the Morgue by Joe Dixon
The AC author’s own words show their accusations are false. They have done a total 180, becoming the very trolls they criticize, all because I support the LGBTQ+ community and minorities, self-expression, individuality, and diversity.
Keep in mind these are the AC author’s words. I’m not nearly so pushy when asking for support. I simply say if you enjoy my work consider supporting.
Identity:
Another wild claim of theirs, in an attempt to justify their hateful discrimination, is that by supporting these groups I’m distracting from the purpose of ending wealth inequality and everyone must identify as the working class and nothing else. This is false and their strategy is doomed to failure. In “Without the Mob…” they say,
“Is your primary identity working class, or something else? Exotic minorities, even when they are part of the working class, don’t identify primarily with the working class… It’s real simple: if you are of the working class yet your primary identity is anything other than “working class citizen,” then you are a traitor to humanity and not on our side. Fuck you!” – David Sinlair, Without the Mob, There is No Circus
This is a ridiculous position that will never work and in no way justifies extremist, hateful discrimination.
Remember I am about collectivity and solidarity as much as I am for individuality and expression but one does not have to be sacrificed for the other as the AC irrationally proselytizes. In Hyperianism we are about the individual and the collective. We can all be our unique selves while coming together in solidarity as a strong and supportive community. Here is a quote from a summary of a book on Anticapitalism by Sociologist Erik Olin Wright which reflects the Hyperian position:
“Anticapitalists need to recognize the importance of people’s moral values and identities.
Why do you do the things you do? What motivates and guides your decisions? Unless you’re an imaginary person straight out of an economics textbook, the answer isn’t your economic self-interests alone. To at least some degree, you’re also influenced by your moral values.
That’s especially true of people’s political activism. Consider Friedrich Engels – Karl Marx’s closest comrade and coauthor of The Communist Manifesto. If ever there was an anticapitalist, Engels was one. And yet he was also the son of a wealthy capitalist who owned a manufacturing company. According to classical Marxism, Engels’s class interests would have been completely in favor of capitalism. So why did he oppose it? Because he found it morally offensive.
In other words, values are such a powerful motivating force that they can completely override people’s economic self-interests. But those aren’t the only factors that can move people into action. Another one is identity.
Anticapitalists need to recognize the importance of people’s moral values and identities.
Here’s another philosophical question: Who are you as a human being? Chances are, the first answer that comes to mind isn’t “I’m a worker.” And that almost certainly isn’t the only answer anyone would give.
Now, the vast majority of us are, in fact, workers. In fact, putting aside the complications of modern-day capitalism’s fragmentary class structure, most of us still qualify as members of the working class in the classical Marxist sense of the term. We don’t own the means of production; we have to sell our labor power and work for a wage.
But the fact that we’re workers is just one aspect of who we are. We also have genders, ethnicities, religions, nationalities, sexual orientations, professions – the list goes on and on. In reality, all of us have multifaceted identities made up of a complicated mixture of elements like these.
Now, insofar as someone identifies as a worker and believes that capitalism is against her class interests, she may be drawn to the anticapitalist cause. But what if she also identifies as Black, female, LGBTQ+, or part of any other group that faces oppression, inequality, or injustice? In that case, she’s got other interests and social justice issues to worry about than just the economic justice issues of the working class.
If anticapitalists don’t speak to those other interests and issues, their cause won’t speak to her.
By appealing to moral values, we can connect anticapitalist politics to people’s diverse identities and interests.
Alright, so class interests aren’t the be-all, end-all of anticapitalist politics. Values and identities matter too, and class interests don’t even cover the full extent of people’s overall self-interests.
People can have all sorts of other interests related to their race, gender, and various other aspects of their identities. Meanwhile, class interests themselves are multifaceted and contradictory, thanks to contemporary capitalism having such a fragmented class structure.
If all of this stuff about interests, values, identities, and class sounds complicated, that’s because it is. People are complicated. The world is complicated. And, to be effective, the politics of anticapitalism must be complicated too. There’s no way to simplify these things without doing them injustice. But there is something we can do to make them a little more tractable, at least.
The key message here is: By appealing to moral values, we can connect anticapitalist politics to people’s diverse identities and interests.
Consider a Black person living in the US. Now, he’s not just Black. He’s many other things too – maybe a jazz lover, book reader, father, New Yorker, and so on. As a person, he’s all of these things at once. But in particular contexts, different aspects of his identity come to the fore. At a book club, he’s primarily a book reader – at a jazz concert, a jazz lover.
However, he also lives in the more general context of a society where racism continues to deeply affect Black people in all sorts of ways. Consequently, he could be a worker too, but on a day-to-day level, he might identify – and be identified by others – as a Black person first and foremost. His interests in racial justice issues might therefore be of more prominent concern to him as a Black person than his interests in economic issues as a worker.
That’s not to say these interests, issues, and identities are in opposition to each other. On the contrary, they often align and intersect. For example, Black people face discrimination at the workplace – an issue of both racial and economic justice. It’s something that should be of concern to anyone who cares about equality and fairness. Those are bedrock values that most of us share, and they help to link anticapitalist politics with antiracist politics, in this case.
Drawing attention to these sorts of value-based alignments and intersections is a crucial task for anticapitalists today.”
While I don’t agree with all of Erik’s ideas in his book, the above quote is absolutely right. Drawing everyone under a common cause by showing them why it is important and impacts them personally is what works, not spewing hate at everyone in an attempt to eliminate their identity or override it with working class.
Brainwashing Tactics:
Reflect on the fact that the AC is so aggressively opposed to me because I am, according to them, a “woke liberal.” This is because of my support for the LGBTQ+ community, minorities, diversity, self-expression, and individuality. Why would a group want to viciously attack me for this? Even if they didn’t like the way I do things, it would still result in more people receptive to the ideas of OM and opposing the rich elite. I will show that the reason for their extreme aggression is because their vision for the world does not support these groups and wants some of them to be erased.
First, I need to point out the conditioning tactics they have been using over the years. I come from a strict religious household where I had to break religious brainwashing. I am experienced when it comes to spotting conditioning tactics.
There were several red flags that stuck out to me, some of them being their constant repetition, the structuring of their material, the number of their books, use of mythos, appeal to authority, inconsistency, gradual increase in radical views over time, and (in their later work) the attack on psychedelics. I will say more on that last aspect later.
The reason I overlooked these red flags was because, at the time, I believed they ultimately had a benevolent goal. I started to become extremely suspicious when they began to increase their radical rhetoric with The Locust Party and attempted to pressure me into becoming radical. However, in their recent emotional outbursts, they made the mistake of revealing too much of their true intentions too soon by including their extreme anti-diversity stance in “Without the Mob…” With the publication of that book, it is now clear to me that they have an entirely different agenda that they are slowly conditioning their followers to accept.
The tactics they use are obvious to anyone that is familiar with them. One of these tactics is the way their books are structured. They’re written in such a way that a logical argument is presented, followed by an emotional rant and assertion on an entirely different topic. This pattern is done repeatedly: Logical argument about some concept such as mathematics, then an emotional rant and assertions about something unrelated like religion, or liberals, followed by a logical topic, followed by an emotional rant and assertions etc… Often (but not always,) these assertions are unfounded.
This pattern has two purposes. The first, is that it causes you to accept them as rational, so when they present an emotional assertion that has nothing to do with the subject at hand, you’ll be likely to accept it as true without supporting evidence. The second is that many of their books are broken up into scattered topics (it will go from a discussion of OM to a rant on religion, to meritocracy, to a rant against liberals, then back to OM again etc.), which causes you to have to integrate the entirety of their ideology. Every piece of it is integrated in your mind via this broken up pattern that is pieced together as you read.
You’ll also notice the sheer number of their books. Their books are needlessly long and is often the same material just rehashed and spun in different ways. This keeps the conditioning fresh because brainwashing begins to wear off the longer one abstains from the conditioning material. The length needed for it to wear off depends on how conditioned an individual is. I have direct experience with this from my indoctrination into mainstream religion. The frightening part about this is that people who are conditioned will swear up and down they aren’t conditioned. At least three to six months completely abstaining from the material would be needed for the brainwashing to begin to wear off. Keep in mind this is a low estimate. It took me years to fully break the conditioning of mainstream religion.
One of the reasons (there are multiple) they release so many books with rehashed material is to keep the conditioning fresh, as well as slowly increase radicalization. If that weren’t the case, a clearly more effective strategy would be to write 10 to 15 books and then focus on spreading those to the public. I recognized these tactics but overlooked them because I believed their intentions were ultimately good. Two years ago, I became suspicious of this, and I began to distance myself and Hyperianism from them and didn’t pay attention to their material. Then suddenly, with the release of “Without the Mob…” my suspicions were confirmed, and their radicalization dramatically increased in this book. There are more brainwashing tactics of theirs to break down, but first we have to look at their real intentions to understand why they have adopted these tactics.
Their Intentions:
If their intentions were truly nefarious, obviously they couldn’t just come out and say that. No one would join them. They would have to pose as something else, recruit individuals under false pretenses, then slowly increase conditioning and radicalization until their recruits would adopt their intentions without question.
“The Illuminati” is the mythos they have chosen to package their intentions and hide their true identity. “The Illuminati” is an archetypal symbol that they associate every figure or idea they agree with by claiming historic individuals, such as Hegel, Pythagoras, and Leibniz, were grand masters. This tactic is common in occult and esoteric communities. This also gives them an “authority” and elements of fear and intimidation they would not have if they revealed who they really were.
The following sections are important in understanding how they are radicalizing and conditioning their followers into adopting abhorrently hateful stances. One of their most extreme tactics to accomplish this is their praise and association with Nazism. In the following sections we will examine their repeated associations with Nazism, and then I will show exactly why they have done this.
The Seeding of Hateful Ideology:
“The Illuminati” is what they claim they are. It is what they pose as and to which they associate everything they agree with. Recall who they associate the Illuminati with. In the God Series by Mike Hockney, in addition to claiming various philosophers as being grand masters of the Illuminati, they claim that the Illuminati are Gnostics. They say repeatedly that the Illuminati were the Gnostics, the Cathars, and the Templars.
With this in mind, recall the name of their project is “The Armageddon Conspiracy.” They have a book named “The Armageddon Conspiracy” that they call “coded fiction.” By this, they mean that the book is a work of fiction but contains hidden truth. They claim this book contains the secrets of the Illuminati. On the original AC website, they said this about their coded novels which includes the Armageddon Conspiracy book:
“We prefer this fictional approach because it allows us to conceal the truth from our enemies. They are unable to distinguish between the fact and the fiction. But those who have ears for our message – they will learn the truth… We hired a successful ghost-writer to create four coded ‘novels’ for us that would outline our purpose. The chosen writer was handsomely rewarded and sworn to secrecy.” – the AC website
According to them, their book “The Armageddon Conspiracy” (which reflects the name of their project) contains hidden truth they wish to conceal from their enemies.
The heroes of The Armageddon Conspiracy novel are The Illuminati—who are revealed to be neo-Nazis. In the book, Hitler is said to have been one of the grand masters of the Illuminati. Recall that in the AC’s philosophical books, they associate the Illuminati with the Gnostics, Cathars, and Templars. In the AC novel, they associate the Illuminati with the Gnostics, Cathars, Templars, and Nazis.
They associate the Illuminati with every group they associate them with in their philosophical works but also include the Nazis in their novel. They included it in their work of “coded fiction.” Some may think that it couldn’t be possible that they would actually associate themselves with Nazis but ponder this: No one in their right mind would associate their group with the Nazis and make them misunderstood heroes in any story let alone a book that is supposed to contain hidden truth.
The Armageddon Conspiracy Novel:
The following is a quote from the Armageddon Conspiracy coded novel:
“‘Hitler and all his top henchmen were leading adepts of the Illuminati. Some have said Hitler was the supreme Grand Master, having complete authority over the American branch of the Illuminati.’
‘Well, I know all about the occult roots of Nazism. The senior Nazis thought Cain was the father of the Aryan Race. Cain, they believed, was blue-eyed, blond, with pale skin, while his brother Abel was a classic Semite – brown-eyed, dark-haired with sallow skin. ‘The Nazi leadership, for obvious reasons, didn’t openly divulge that they were Gnostics. Only senior Nazis knew they had inherited the mantle of the Cathars and the Knights Templar. They hated the Jews because the Jews were the self-proclaimed Chosen People of Jehovah – Satan, as the Nazis saw him. After they dealt with the Jews, they would have turned their attention to the two other peoples of “the Book” – the Muslims and the Christians; Satan worshippers as far as the Nazis were concerned. They weren’t fighting a political war; it was a Gnostic Holy War.” – Mike Hockney, The Armageddon Conspiracy
In this novel, they are directly linking the Nazis and their mission with the mission they outline in their later philosophical work. For context, Cain is a gnostic figure (the Gnostics known as Cainnites.)
Here is a direct quote from the God Game, their first book in the God Series, which is their nonfiction philosophical work by Mike Hockney:
“What happened to Pythagoras’s mysterious secret society (whose roots extend far back to the dawn of human civilisation and whose ancient adepts included Solomon the Apostate, the genius who heroically tried to kill Jehovah, the monstrous Torture God)? It became known as the Illuminati – the enlightened ones – and it has survived to this day, despite relentless Abrahamic persecution. Mithraism, alchemy, Hermeticism, the Gnostic religion of the medieval Cathar heretics, the outlawed Knights Templar and the original anti-establishment Freemasonry (nothing like pro-establishment modern WASP Freemasonry) were all guises of the Illuminati. The Illuminati are humanity’s true hope and light, the voice of the Enlightenment. Join the army of Light and Reason.” – Mike Hockney, The God Game
These two passages, one from “coded fiction” and the other from their philosophical work reflect the same groups and mission. However, the Nazis are omitted from the philosophical work because no one would join them if they made that association, but doing so in a work of coded fiction allows for the planting of the seeds of accepting hateful stances in their followers.
Why would they include this at all? Even in fiction? Because this is how conditioning works. Near the beginning of their project, they plant the seed that the Nazis and their mission are misunderstood heroes so that these ideas enter the unconscious while they slowly turn up the radicalism in their books over the years.
Let’s look at a passage from the AC coded novel that paints Hitler as a misunderstood hero:
“The Führer [Hitler], in his brown leather coat, followed us in. Cain himself couldn’t have looked more majestic. If anyone was marked out by destiny as our deliverer, it was the Führer. We formed two lines, gave the Roman salute and shouted, ‘Heil Hitler!’ as he strode past us.
Following him, we walked through the Imperial Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire, ignoring the glittering trinkets. Already, we felt the Spear’s presence. I imagined that the legions of martyrs who struggled for so long to avenge our Lord, to bring us back to the true light, marched behind us. For thousands of years, the Enemy’s persecution of us never faltered. They hanged us, beheaded us, drowned us, burned us alive, disembowelled us, did everything in their power to exterminate us. Always there were traitors, infiltrators, spies, deserters, turncoats, the weak and the fainthearted, but the Secret Doctrine survived every attempt to destroy it.
The Führer gave a signal to SS-Hauptsturmführer Neumann… We all clicked our heels and yelled, ‘Sieg Heil!’ ‘Our quest is nearing its end,’ the Führer said. ‘Cain’s destiny is almost fulfilled.’ I wanted to weep when I heard those words. I stared at the two sig runes that made up my SS insignia. Sig for victory. Sig for vengeance. Sig Sig – the mark the Enemy once branded on us to humiliate us, but which we now wore with pride. It reminded us every day of what we had to do…
He ordered us to leave then remained alone with the Spear for over an hour. When he emerged, he didn’t speak, but it was obvious something had changed. I can’t begin to describe the odd expression in his eyes. ‘Our Enemy hasn’t begun to suspect our true nature,’ he said. ‘They call us warmongers, fascists, totalitarians. Not for one second have they conceived who we really are. Soon we’ll bring humanity its greatest and most unexpected gift.’ He smiled in a way I’d never seen before, as though he knew that the great burden he carried would soon be lifted. ‘Don’t you feel it?’ he remarked, and I could swear he trembled. ‘It’s almost here.’ Then he said the words we had all waited so long to hear. ‘The end of the world.’” – Mike Hockney, The Armageddon Conspiracy
Read that last passage once more: “‘Our Enemy hasn’t begun to suspect our true nature,’ he said. ‘They call us warmongers, fascists, totalitarians. Not for one second have they conceived who we really are.’”
Recall the words from the original AC website: “We prefer this fictional approach because it allows us to conceal the truth from our enemies. They are unable to distinguish between the fact and the fiction. But those who have ears for our message – they will learn the truth…”
No one would make Hitler their grand master and paint him as a hero that the world misunderstood, and make themselves Nazis in a book that was supposed to contain hidden truth. It makes no sense unless it was meant to seed the unconscious for increasing radicalization and acceptance of hateful stances.
Here is another passage glorifying Hitler and associating him with their plans:
“Soon it would be 30 April, sixty-seven years to the day since Adolf Hitler shot himself in his bunker… Now, Lucy knew, April 30 was the Gnostics’ most special day, the day when they believed the rule of Jehovah, the Demiurge, would end once and for all. Hitler had thought that day would come during his own lifetime, that he would instigate the final act. Instead, he ended his own world on April 30.” – Mike Hockney, The Armageddon Conspiracy
In the Armageddon Conspiracy Novel, “Sinclair” is the last name of the character that reveals himself to be a secret member of the Illuminati and a Nazi. In the following passages Sinclair is the one speaking:
“‘We are the Invisible College,’ he said, ‘the governing body of the Illuminati.” and “Galahad was one of us – a Templar.’ ‘But you’re wearing black.’ ‘We wear black because Cain’s priesthood did; the same reason why Hitler’s SS wore black. They, like us, displayed the Death’s Head. Today, more than ever, that’s our most sacred symbol.’” – Mike Hockney, The Armageddon Conspiracy
In the above quote Sinclair emphasizes the importance of the SS Death’s Head as the Illuminati’s most sacred symbol. Let’s take a moment to examine the imagery used by the AC. The AC doesn’t use much symbolism but most of the symbolism it does use is closely associated with Nazism. They are the closest symbols that could be used without using actual Nazi imagery.
Their website prominently displays the Templar Cross, with the Skull and Bones, and the slogan “In Hoc Signo Vinces” meaning “In This Sign, You Will Conquer.” They also often use the skull and bones of the “Jolly Roger” flag. Recently, they have requested their followers post the skull and bones on their social media pages:
Compare these symbols to the Nazi “Iron Cross” the SS “Death’s Head” and the use of the slogan “In Hoc Signo Vinces:”
Let’s explore more of their inclusions of Nazi themes in their nonfiction, philosophical work, before breaking down why they are doing this. Everything that follows is not from their “coded novels” but from their philosophical work that outlines their ideology.
In their nonfiction, philosophical work, the AC constantly refers to themselves as Hyperboreans:
“The world would be transformed overnight if it embraced the Apollonian Religion (the Hyperborean religion of Illumination)” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“We are the Hyperboreans because we are the rationalist followers of Apollo.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“We are the Mathematikoi. We are the Hyperboreans. We are the Illuminati”. – Adam Weishaupt, Contra Mundum
Hyperborea is directly linked to Nazi occultism. Consider the following description of the Thule Society:
“The Thule Society… was a German occultist and Völkisch group founded in Munich shortly after World War I, named after a mythical northern country in Greek legend. The society is notable chiefly as the organization that sponsored the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (DAP; German Workers’ Party), which was later reorganized by Adolf Hitler into the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP or Nazi Party). According to Hitler biographer Ian Kershaw, the organization’s “membership list … reads like a Who’s Who of early Nazi sympathizers and leading figures in Munich”, including Rudolf Hess, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Julius Lehmann, Gottfried Feder, Dietrich Eckart, and Karl Harrer…
“Thule” was a land located by Greco-Roman geographers in the farthest north (often displayed as Iceland).] The Latin term “Ultima Thule” is also mentioned by Roman poet Virgil in his pastoral poems called the Georgics… The Thule Society identified Ultima Thule as a lost ancient landmass in the extreme north, near Greenland or Iceland, said by Nazi mystics to be the capital of ancient Hyperborea.” – Wikipedia
In addition to referring to themselves as Hyperboreans, the AC constantly calls themselves “The coming race.”
“A Wonderful World – No Christians, no Jews, no Muslims, no Karmists… It’s time for the New World Order, for the advent of the Coming Race. The Harvest Time is approaching.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“The Day of Victory is coming. We are the Coming Race.” – Adam Weishaupt, Contra Mundum
“To all those who oppose the Illuminati, we tell you this: you are doomed. The triumph of the Illuminated Ones, the Enlightened Ones, is inevitable. The Dialectic has spoken. We are the future. We are the Omega Point. We are the Coming Race. You are the dead, failed past that lives in a fantasy world of total lies and delusions that you insanely proclaim truth and certainty.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
Both “the coming race” and “Hyperborea” are connected to Nazi societies—Hyperborea with the Thule Society, and the coming race to the Vril Society.
“The Coming Race is a novel by Edward Bulwer-Lytton, published anonymously in 1871. It has also been published as Vril, the Power of the Coming Race.
Some readers have believed the account of a superior subterranean master race and the energy-form called “Vril”, at least in part; some theosophists, notably Helena Blavatsky, William Scott-Elliot, and Rudolf Steiner, accepted the book as based on occult truth, in part. One 1960 book, The Morning of the Magicians by Jacques Bergier and Louis Pauwels, suggested that a secret Vril Society existed in Weimar Berlin.” – Wikipedia
The original AC website also mentions them:
“The “Vril Society” was supposedly the core of the “Thule Society” that was dedicated to exploring the alleged links between the Aryan race and fabled Atlantis. (The Aryans were said to have travelled to Atlantis from their northern home known as Thule or Ultima Thule or Hyperborea).” – The AC website
Breaking it Down:
Let’s now break down exactly why they are doing this and how it’s a conditioning tactic for the acceptance of hateful ideologies. The AC “coded novel” directly portrays the Illuminati as Nazis. The AC themselves addressed this in one of their early nonfiction books called “The God Secret” in 2012:
“A few people have mentioned to us the portrayal of the Nazis in the novel The Armageddon Conspiracy where they are depicted relatively sympathetically. This novel is based on an ancient plot to kill the Devil (Jehovah) and the Nazis are presented as Gnostics following in the line of the Alchemists, the Cathars, Knights Templar and original Freemasons. It’s a sort of “what if” scenario. Nietzsche has been branded the “Nazi philosopher” even though he was anything but, and Heidegger actually was a Nazi philosopher (although he certainly wasn’t a Nazi in the sense in which Nazism is now understood). Heidegger thought that Nazism would restore authenticity and spirit to an increasingly fake, capitalist, consumer world.
Imagine a benevolent Nazism (national SOCIALISM) based on Gnosticism, Nietzsche, Heidegger and meritocracy. Imagine Hitler as a Platonic philosopher king rather than as a lunatic. Imagine Nazism curing the world of Abrahamism. If that’s what Nazism had actually been about, we could now be living in a great world. Instead, Nazism was about psychotic racism and actually just an Aryan version of Judaism (with the “Master Race” replacing the “Chosen People” and Hitler replacing Jehovah).” – Mike Hockney, The God Secret
Here they are slowly bringing the seeded hate from the “coded novel” and the world of “fiction” into the reality of their philosophy. They are telling their followers to imagine a benevolent Nazism and Hitler as a philosopher king “curing” the world of Abrahamism. Take a step back and look at that again… they want you to imagine the world run by “good” Nazis and a philosophical Hitler that will “cure” the world of Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Here they are laying the seeds of a so-called “benevolent Nazism” that targets religious people instead of race.
Let’s now examine a quote from another one of their books that came out a year later (where a year of conditioning had been working on their followers) that explicitly lays out their “solution” to Jews, Christians, and Muslims. In this passage they directly label religious people as subhuman and call for the Final Solution, which refers to genocidal extermination through systematic mass murder. This is exactly what the Nazis did to the Jews.
“People of faith are subhuman. Fuck Allah. Fuck Mohammed. Fuck Jehovah. Fuck Abraham. Fuck Moses. Fuck Jesus Christ. Fuck all practising Jews. Fuck all practising Muslims. Fuck all practising Christians. Fuck them all. The Final Solution of the Abrahamic problem is needed before humanity can begin its next stage of evolution … to divinity.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
The Holocaust Encyclopedia defines the Final Solution:
“The Nazi “Final Solution to the Jewish Question” (“Endlösung der Judenfrage”) was the deliberate and systematic mass murder of European Jews. It was the last stage of the Holocaust and took place from 1941 to 1945. Though many Jews were killed before the “Final Solution” began, the vast majority of Jewish victims were murdered during this period.
It is not known when the leaders of Nazi Germany definitively decided to implement the “Final Solution.” What is clear, however, is that the “Final Solution” was the culmination of a decade of increasingly severe discriminatory, anti-Jewish measures implemented by the Nazis. Today, the “Final Solution” is used as a synonym for the genocide of Europe’s Jews.”
This would make any human with a shred of decency, sick. In their book the God Secret, “Nazi” is mentioned just 9 times. One year later, in their 2013 book “All the Rest is Propaganda” the word “Nazi” is mentioned 72 times. Let’s look at some of the passages in that book that increases their followers radicalization and acceptance of hateful ideology through praising elements of Nazism and even promoting a meritocratic Nazism:
“Nazi Germany is rightly regarded as a monstrous regime, and yet, with different people in charge – instead of thugs, psychopaths and fantasists – it might have been something wondrous. Germany could have become the first advanced nation to overthrow Abrahamism, “democracy” and free-market capitalism, to create a people rather than a population, to have a nation of the spirit rather than one of material objects, to be a Gnostic nation of ideals and knowledge, devoted to the pursuit of perfection and transcendence.
People must think properly, even about horrors and abominations. Because of the extermination camps, it’s believed that Nazi Germany has nothing to teach the world, except in a strictly negative sense (a “warning from history”). Of course, the people most heavily promoting this analysis are the Abrahamists, democrats and free-market capitalists – exactly those who were despised by the Nazis. If there were a meritocratic National Socialist Germany, led by people of the calibre of Leibniz, Kant, Goethe, Weishaupt, Hegel, Fichte, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Heidegger, it would a Wonder of the Ages, the great beacon that leads humanity out of the darkness.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“Hitler identified the stateless Jews as the controllers of international finance, owing no loyalty to any State. He saw predatory capitalism as the mechanism by which the Jews were able to run the world (through globalism). And bear in mind that predatory capitalism is infinitely worse today than in Hitler’s time! We now have a de facto Jewish one-world government where the rich, predatory capitalists rule everything via the “market”. This market sits above all nation states and they are all subject to it without having any control or say over it. We must all dance to the rich man’s tune. It’s precisely this shadow world government by international financiers (the puppet masters) that must be abolished once and for all.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“The most significant positive liberty States have always attacked religion. The French Revolutionaries sought to abolish Catholicism, the Russian Revolutionaries Eastern Orthodox Christianity, and the Nazi Revolutionaries the Abrahamic religion. Positive liberty States seek to replace religion and to define a new vision for the human race and for human potential.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“The Jews suffer from the religious equivalent of the Dunning–Kruger effect: they are talentless individuals who rate their status and significance much higher than everyone else. The Jews were the first people in history to develop a wholly deranged superiority complex, with no conceivable basis in the facts of the world. The Jews were always a pathetic little tribe surrounded by superpowers such as Egypt, Babylon and Rome. Unable to compete on Earth, the Jews decided that they would compete cosmically – by laying claim to the Creator of the entire universe and declaring themselves his Chosen People, prized above all others. Logically, the Jews should have left the world stage long ago. The fact that they are still here is testament to the degree of their collective psychosis. If you call yourselves the Chosen People, you had better be able to prove it. If you can’t, you can expect exactly the treatment the Jews have experienced down the ages. The most preposterous claims must be backed up by the maximum of force, not the minimum. The Nazis called themselves the Master Race and made a good fist of backing up their claims. The Jews also called themselves the Master Race despite being defeated by everyone all the time. Why do they persist with their manifestly disproven claims and beliefs? There is no Jewish God. They are not the chosen ones but, rather, the damned. That’s the lesson from history.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
They quote Hitler in this book: “The masses are feminine and stupid. Only emotion and hatred can keep them under control.” – Adolf Hitler
“In Nazi Germany, a political rally was about pure propaganda, and the projection of total power. Look at the use of bold colours – red, white and black, and the use of dark and light. Look at the arrangement of flags and banners. Look at the slogans used and the set up of the stage. You could tell that politics meant something, that it was the authentic source of power in Germany. Now consider modern political rallies. Unthreatening pastel shades are everywhere. Everything is intended to produce enthusiasm but no intimidation. Boring speakers with nothing to say are allowed to take the stage. The audience wear silly hats and carry silly little flags. The note that is struck is one of amateurish comedy rather than any serious projection of power.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
“Imagine if the Nazis had not been committed to some absurd notion of the “Master Race” but had instead been devoted to the optimisation of the whole human race through the overthrow of capitalism and Abrahamism and the promotion of global merit – getting the most from each and every citizen, maximising everyone’s talents and contribution. Humanity can achieve anything if it commits itself to Meritocracy. Hell mend those morons and selfish individuals that stand in our way. They are the problem and we are the solution.” – Mike Hockney, All the Rest is Propaganda
In these passages they praise Nazis, spread conspiracy theories about Jews, and consistently link a so-called “benevolent” Nazism with the same goals as meritocracy. These are not just seeds of hate anymore. They are beginning to sprout and take hold of their followers. Notice the constant increase of more radicalization and hate over the years.
In their recent book, “Without the Mob…” by David Sinclair the radicalization and ideology of genocidal hate has increased dramatically. They have turned from targeting exclusively religious people–as if that wasn’t disgusting enough–to targeting members of the LGBTQ+ community and diversity in general. Let’s take a look at some passages from the Sinclair book (I also find it very interesting that Sinclair is also the last name of the hidden Illuminati-Nazi member in their “coded novel.”)
Remember, all the quotes that follow are not from their novel but from their nonfiction work that outlines their actual ideology.
Let’s look at a quote from “Without the Mob…” by David Sinclair that praises Jewish genocide:
“The Jews – the world’s best comedians – tried to topple imperial Rome. Is that history’s greatest joke? The punchline fell flat and the Jews were booted out of their divinely promised land. The Romans had no fear of the Jewish Lord of the Universe. If he’s anything like the Jews, the Romans reasoned, he’s not much of an opponent. And they were proved right, of course. All hail Emperor Hadrian!
Wikipedia says, “After the suppression of the [Jewish] revolt, Hadrian’s proclamations sought to root out Jewish nationalism in Judea, which he saw as the cause of the repeated rebellions. He prohibited Torah law and the Hebrew calendar, and executed Judaic scholars. The sacred scrolls of Judaism were ceremonially burned at the large Temple complex for Jupiter which he built on the Temple Mount. At this Temple, he installed two statues, one of Jupiter, another of himself. In an attempt to erase any memory of Judea or Ancient Israel, he wiped the name off the map and replaced it with Syria Palaestina. By destroying the association of Jews with Judea and forbidding the practice of the Jewish faith, Hadrian aimed to root out a nation that had inflicted heavy casualties on the Roman Empire. Similarly, under the argument to ensure the prosperity of the newly founded Roman [city] of Aelia Capitolina, Jews were forbidden to enter, except on the day of Tisha B’Av. … the Jewish population of Judea was devastated after the Bar Kokhba Revolt, being killed, exiled, or sold into slavery, with so many captives auctioned at ‘Hadrian’s Market’ that the price of the Jews were as low as the price of a horse.”
Just think of how close Hadrian came to ending the Abrahamic problem once and for all. He was almost one of the greatest men in history.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
In this passage of one of the AC’s latest nonfiction books, they praise emperor Hadrian for devastating the Jewish population and selling them into slavery for the price of a horse at Hadrian’s Market. They say he was almost one of the greatest men in history. Read that again and really let it sink in.
If the AC praises Hadrian as nearly one of the greatest men in history for killing Jews, what do you think their opinion of Hitler is? Obviously they would feel the exact same way. There is no difference. They would absolutely be praising Hitler if they could without losing all their followers.
Do you see how close they have gotten their followers to accepting Jewish genocide? They said, “Hail Emperor Hadrian!” There is no way they could be clearer for their admiration of Hitler’s actions apart from saying it directly. They are just one step away from “Heil Hitler!” Even though it’s staring them in the face, their followers can’t see it. That’s how brainwashing works.
What did the coded AC novel say? That after the Jews were killed, they would move on to the Christians and the Muslims. This is their agenda. They state it outright when they called for “The Final Solution” to Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
This book by David Sinclair is where they make their move to condition their followers to integrate their hateful ideology towards members of the LGBTQ+ community and diversity and individuality in general. They are clearly preparing people to accept the extermination of members of the LGBTQ+ community, specifically transgender and nonbinary people, just as they did religious people in their earlier material. They call non-binary individuals “fictional” and “degenerates” which is a tactic, used by the Nazis, to define the people they wanted to erase as “subhuman.”
Consider the following quotes from “Without the Mob, There is No Circus” by David Sinclair.
This passage dehumanizes non-binary individuals and crossdressers by defining them as “fictional” and “degenerates:
“Non-binary isn’t a thing in terms of gender identity. Only male and female exist. Everything revolves around masculinity/femininity and even those who seek to “escape” this never actually do so (they always fall into one pattern or the other — i.e., they are more masculine or more feminine). They like to claim, however, that sounds they aren’t either, because they have the interests of both (!), thus implicitly agreeing that masculinity and femininity actually do exist, but they themselves are super special so they don’t fall into either category. They’re just so UNIQUE! “Non-binary” in terms of traditionally considered roles is surely a thing, but who cares? Who the fuck analyses their own interests to the point that they then conflate their actual gender with them?! A “binary/non-binary” worldview, in terms of interests, refers to traditional gender roles, not gender itself (which, again, is binary).”
“In truth, if the cross-dresser, or the highly fictional “non-binary” (who have actually turned themselves into objects with their they/them bullshit, such is their level of self-loathing), simply came out as homosexual or trans, which they all undoubtedly are, the world would actually accept them better for their honesty. Instead, they take half-measures. They are this but aren’t quite that, want to be but aren’t certain for sure … should they, or shouldn’t they? Um, ah, hm. They are almost certainly trans, or homosexuals in deep denial, likely from a suppressed or religious childhood, where they weren’t allowed to be themselves, so now, as adults, they vomit their insecurities everywhere. They still subconsciously believe it’s wrong to be a homosexual due to their upbringing and want approval from others, for others to tell them that it’s really okay; approval they never got from their own parents; approval they can’t give themselves, so they want you to approve them instead. And if you don’t, they will go berserk, the very way they would love to go berserk at their parents (but can’t due to their cowardice). Cross-dressing is a tantrum; a middle finger to a world which they think imposed something cruel on them (the “gender binary,” or whatever), while also being a cry for help. To top off this smorgasbord, this total clusterfuck of unlooked-at personal issues and psychological traumas, they seek to tell others, nay, sermonize to others, that they are right and totally “progressive” for their “courage” of putting on a dress, while everyone who doesn’t cheer on this lunacy is a small-minded bigot. How enlightened! More like how brain-damaged! Let’s be clear: the act of cross-dressing isn’t just degenerate, it’s also telling of a deeply troubled, hurt, and traumatized mind which can’t come to grips with its own identity and isn’t strong enough to forge any other one, so such people do the easiest thing possible and adorn themselves with a piece of cloth, building it up to be something it’s not. That’s why it’s so nauseating.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
This passage links Jews, Christians, and Muslims to transgender people and “woke liberals.” This tactic is blatantly obvious to anyone familiar with conditioning. They have conditioned their followers for years to hate Jews, Christians, and Muslims and now they are transferring that hate to the LGBTQ+ community:
“What’s hilarious, however, without being funny at all, is that the Woke are now adopting the exact same stance as Abrahamists themselves. For instance, take the irritating phenomenon of pronouns, which is such a muddled mess that even the people declaring that they are “different” can’t explain what they actually mean.
The now-deceased Scottish feminist Magdalene Berns (who was a TERF – Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist) said, “What makes transgender ideology more demanding than religion is that they [transgender activists] expect not only that we accept their faith but that we adopt it. Catholics aren’t going around demanding that we call priests ‘Father’ and accusing us of ‘violence’ if we do not do this. British Muslims aren’t demanding that I walk around in a burka around them. Whereas transgender activists are demanding that we change the way we address them, which means we’ve got to adopt their ideology. Because before anyone says a word out loud – they have to think it.
Clearly, Catholics and Muslims and all other Abrahamists absolutely demand that you respect them and their beliefs and accept their worldview. However, Berns is entirely correct with the last part of her quote. Woke activists are actively accusing anyone not using the “right” pronouns of being anti-trans. If you don’t adhere to their demands (i.e., their worldview) you are labeled a bigot and canceled. There is never any intellectual debate, or even rational grounding for this nonsense. Nope, you are expected to immediately adopt their worldview and acquiesce to their demands and call them whatever they want.
A 250-kilo muscled monster with a beard down to his knees who wants to be called “Jessica” but is really a they/them is totally fine and acceptable, right? So do it, immediately and without question. The question of pronouns isn’t some small, annoying thing. It’s literally forcing people into a position where they feel uncomfortable doing something, but are afraid not to do it for fear of being called any number of slanderous words, which could culminate in their lives being ruined.
The Woke fanatics (and their allies) are actually extremely similar to Jews. They are a tiny percentage of society demanding that everyone recognizes them as special and changes their ways to suit them… In some ways, Woke activists are actually more aggressive towards society than Jews were to the Roman Empire… The Woke are very much like Christians and Muslims. They act in exactly the same way and use exactly the same tactics — modified slightly by the times and by their own inability for violence.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
They continue this tactic by associating Jewish, Christian, and Muslim symbols with LGBTQ+ symbols (the rainbow flag) and all the other groups they despise:
“Let’s be cast-iron clear: Our Revolution is not “allied” with the gay community, the trans community, the climate-change community, the fat-acceptance movement, the “all truths” gang, New Agers, the “co-exist” faction, the disabled community, the sex worker community, drag queens, drug users, cross-dressers, social parasites, so-called “freethinkers,” atheists, vegans, animal rights activists, or any other cause that is narrow and serves only a tiny group of people. We despise conservatism, predatory capitalism, multiculturalism, democracy, Abrahamism, and liberalism. Any symbol representing any of these systems (such as the repellent hijab, the cross, the star of David etc.) is disgusting and should never appear in our circles. This too goes for the flag of liberalism, that hideous, puke-inducing “rainbow” flag, the flag of the mediocre Last Man. It is a symbol of projection, of being whatever you want it to be. It is “all things to all men.”” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
Here, self-expression and diversity is condemned:
“You’ll never catch us on the defensive, kowtowing to minorities or tending to “hurt feelings.” We openly despise diversity as a concept unless that diversity is expressed via genius, heroism, talent, excellence.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
“Woke liberal society says, “Bring your inner weirdo out, and make sure you plaster as much gaudy makeup, wigs, glitter, on your face, and wave a gigantic dildo around while you’re at it while blaring music to drown everyone out. Be as LOUD about your weirdness as possible, as obnoxious and in-your-face as you can about it. Be OBSCENE and provocative and then accuse others of bigotry when they protest in response to our provocations. SCREECH from the rooftops! Anyone who doesn’t accept our way is a bigot and shall be DEPLATFORMED.” The Woke are disgusting degenerates, pushing the envelope further with more and more degenerate stunts. Then they wonder why they aren’t accepted. It’s no big fucking mystery. “ – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
“Is your primary identity working class, or something else? Exotic minorities, even when they are part of the working class, don’t identify primarily with the working class. Their primary fixation is on themselves, which is why they are narcissists who don’t play well with others. They’re individualists always looking to stand out rather than fit in. It’s real simple: if you are of the working class yet your primary identity is anything other than “working class citizen,” then you are a traitor to humanity and not on our side. Fuck you!” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
Extreme hatred and dehumanizing tactics are directed towards transgender and nonbinary people:
“Love & light is not of the Maenad. Veganism is not of the Maenad. Acceptance & tolerance is not of the Maenad (Maenads were strictly women, exclusively so – real women!). Wokeism is thus certainly is not of the Maenad.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
“Gender is a fact. Every human being in this room, every human being on Earth, had to pass through the legs of a woman to be on Earth. This is a fact.” – Dave Chapelle Facts are undeniable. You, like every other human being, have a mother; a woman who brought you crying and screaming into this world. A woman birthed you, fed you at her breast, and a woman nurtured you throughout your formative years. You wouldn’t even be here if it wasn’t for a woman.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
“Only terrible people, only awful people, are so narcissistic that they believe that the world has to bow down to them, ignore the evidence of their own eyes and the basic facts of biology, and use their “proper pronouns”. Fucking grow up.
This is the real world, not your fucking kingdom, your Highness! Fuck anyone who wants to be referred to in special ways and demands that others obey them and be branded bigots if they don’t. You’re the fucking bigot. You’re 100% bigoted against everyone who doesn’t share your extremist Woke ideology, while claiming that you “welcome everyone”. Fucking hypocrite. A bigot is defined in Oxford Languages as “a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic towards a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.” All “pronoun people” are absolute bigots towards those who refuse to play their self-indulgent game and who instead choose to use society’s rational and logical defaults, accepted for millennia.
If you are male, you are referred to as he and him. If you are female, you are referred to as she and her. As simple as 1 + 1 = 2. Totally factual, rational and logical, and absolutely functional. No one is required to be a mind reader to work out how members of the most exotic minorities the world has ever seen want to be designated.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
More extreme hatred and dehumanizing tactics directed towards groups of people are in the following passages. Note also their tactic of total unsubstantiated claims such as “zero masculine heterosexuals are vegan.” They use this tactic constantly, usually broken up between logical/philosophical topics so the mind accepts it without question:
“Vegans are herd animals, afraid of predators. They have a prey mentality, which is why they take the side of prey. They are always anti-masculine individuals, and usually gender fluid. They are opposed to all masculine values. It’s probably accurate to say that zero masculine heterosexuals are vegan. Veganism is an enormous red flag.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
“Polyamory is disgusting; a concept so heinous only a liberal mind could have conceived it. It isn’t a true form of love. It isn’t true love at all.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
Note the references to the holocausts and “communities” in the following passages, conditioning their followers to accept the removal of these groups from society to be placed into camps, likely for elimination:
“What historically happens to loud, obnoxious minorities, hmm? When 99.5% of the world is not like you, and almost certainly neither likes nor will ever accept you, your best bet is to be as quiet as possible about your personal identity crises. You could instead be an exemplary human being, of great intellect, honor, dignity, and respect. You could do world-shattering things. That could be the base upon which your identity is built. But no. That’s much too hard. It’s much easier to throw on a dress and claim that anyone who doesn’t support this is a small-minded bigot. Uh-huh. Yep. The problem is always someone else, isn’t it?” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
“The best they can hope for is to build small communities where they can live out their fantasies with others who are like them in a “safe space.” Their most grievous error, which will absolutely be shown in the next few years, is to try to impose their personal will on the greater Collective. It never works out well. As they are ignorant of history, they do not know this. But they’ll learn. Reality is the harshest master of all. It teaches the necessary lessons.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
Their tactic is clear. They are conditioning their followers to view the LGBTQ+ community (and diverse groups in general) as subhumans that should be removed from society. The first sentence is a reference to the holocaust:
“What historically happens to loud, obnoxious minorities, hmm? When 99.5% of the world is not like you, and almost certainly neither likes nor will ever accept you, your best bet is to be as quiet as possible about your personal identity crises” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
The following excerpt is conditioning their readers that minorities should be put into “communities” which is a precursor to concentration camps. The end of this quote is another reference to the holocaust:
“The best they can hope for is to build small communities where they can live out their fantasies with others who are like them in a “safe space.” Their most grievous error, which will absolutely be shown in the next few years, is to try to impose their personal will on the greater Collective. It never works out well. As they are ignorant of history, they do not know this. But they’ll learn. Reality is the harshest master of all. It teaches the necessary lessons.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
If you don’t think they would ever do such a thing, let’s look at a quote from Sinclair which praises China for their Muslim “reeducation” camps. Here is a description of these camps from Wikipedia:
“The Xinjiang internment camps, officially called vocational education and training centers by the government of China, are internment camps operated by the government of Xinjiang and the Chinese Communist Party Provincial Standing Committee. Human Rights Watch says that they have been used to indoctrinate Uyghurs and other Muslims since 2017 as part of a “people’s war on terror”, a policy announced in 2014. The camps have been criticized by the governments of many countries and human rights organizations for alleged human rights abuses, including mistreatment, rape, and torture, with some of them alleging genocide.” – Wikipedia
David Sinclair writes:
“The age of retarded, lethal religions must finally be brought to an end. Who’s going to do it? China – the great world-historic power that has arisen in the East – is the only nation with the guts to do what needs to be done. In the coming decades, it will be China, and only China, which faces up to reality. It has the will to do what needs to be done. Nowhere else does. The very things that the West most condemn about China are the very things that guarantee China’s success and the total failure of the West.” – David Sinclair, The Locust Party
When you look at their writing and see their disgusting and abhorrent intentions to exterminate Jews, Christians, and Muslims, ask yourself how long will it be before they are saying the same thing about “woke liberals,” transgender people, and “fictional,” ” degenerate” nonbinary people? And where will they stop? The rest of that book is filled with praise for China, by the way.
Take note of their stance on creating dull and neutral public spaces devoid of individuality and expression:
“Hags and Stags? Wikipedia says, “A fag hag is, in gay slang, a woman who associates either mostly or exclusively with gay and bisexual men. … The male counterpart, for heterosexual men who have similar interpersonal relationships with gay and bisexual men is fag stag.” Some honesty, please. Hyperianism is predominantly a community of fag hags and fag stags. Any masculine person wouldn’t last five minutes in the Hyperian community… Don’t you find it odd that the leader of Hyperianism never has any guests on his “show”? The very last people who would be invited on would be heterosexual, masculine men. That would not go well!
Isn’t it time that the sensible people came forward from the “non-heterosexual” scene and tried to find commonality with the heterosexual majority rather than continuously antagonizing it? It would be great if no one ever had to be made aware of anyone else’s sexuality – if a law of neutrality applied in all public spaces, with people saving their sexual expression for “scenes” where everyone in such a scene shared their tastes, so no one got offended.” – David Sinclair, “Without the Mob, There is No Circus”
Let’s take a look at a quote from another one of their books, “All the Rest is Propaganda” by Mike Hockney:
“In the public space, neutrality is the fairest, most just and rational position. The less neutral your behaviour is in the public space, the more you are bullying others to accept your private tastes. Keep your tastes for your private space. If you bring them to the public space and impose them on others, expect trouble.” – “All the Rest is Propaganda” by Mike Hockney
There it is. In black and white. They want a bland world of neutrality and conformity where self-expression will be made illegal unless done in your home. There are so many more examples I could point to, but I don’t have the time or inclination to wade through their hate. Only a handful of quotes are taken from “Without the Mob, There is No Circus” which is an 800 page book filled with page after page of hatred of the same caliber. This is enough for any decent person to realize that the AC are vile.
Let me take a moment to comment that their followers will say that I’m cherry-picking quotes and taking them out of context. My answer to this is twofold: First, they have written somewhere around 200 books. I do not have the time to examine every one of their statements. Second, let’s look at a quote their own followers often point to that “provides context” in their eyes:
“Our movement is not anti-gay, anti-trans, or anti anything EXCEPT the OWO. And even then, we are against the OWO because we are for something else; an NWO — Illuminated Meritocracy. We are positive, not negative. We do not define ourselves by what we are against, but what we are for.
But just because we aren’t anti-minority certainly doesn’t mean we’re pro-minority either. We’re simply net neutral towards them and welcome them if they join our Cause and denounce them as traitors to humanity if they don’t — exactly the same as anyone. We are all about equal treatment. Stand up straight! Be a human being of dignity, no matter what your “identity” may be. In fact, if life has dealt you a bad hand, then you can transmute that suffering into a thing of greatness. You are more predisposed towards heroism than someone who has had an easy ride their whole life. Use it and grow from it.
Let’s be clear about something: just because we don’t specifically march for fringe minority causes does not mean that these types of people won’t benefit from our New World Order. We fight for them as much as anyone else; we will just never put them front and center. In many ways, they have ostracized themselves by always pointing out how different they are to everyone else. We focus on sameness. So, they can stop with the nonsense and join us, or keep living in their own weird bubbles and crying how life is unfair.” – David Sinclair, Without the Mob, There Is No Circus
Their followers claim this quote shows they don’t discriminate. First, note that this is about the most basic form of begrudging “acceptance” one could possibly write. They say they are neutral. This shows they do not uphold principles of equity. Principles of equity are critical for uplifting those who are oppressed. They specifically say they do not do this.
Second, and this is of the utmost importance, just because they say they don’t discriminate a few times doesn’t erase the pages and pages where they rant and rage against minorities (such as in the quotes above.) It does not nullify all their comments about nonbinary people being degenerate, trans women not being real women, those who are part of the LGBTQ+ should be quiet and sent to their own “communities” and all the other vitriolic hatred.
This is another conditioning tactic where contradicting statements are made so that their readers will gloss over what might be uncomfortable and focus on what they feel more comfortable with, but nonetheless all the pages and pages of rage, discriminations, hatred, and genocide gets absorbed into the readers unconscious.
Imagine I came up to you and said, “Gay people are degenerates” but then said, “Oh but I don’t discriminate.” Obviously, you wouldn’t accept that, yet that is exactly what Sinclair does except with pages of raging hatred and a few paragraphs thrown in about not discriminating. You would have to be blind (or brainwashed) not to see this. This is a blatant conditioning tactic to cause the reader to look past what they don’t want to acknowledge, yet it becomes implanted in the unconscious.
Another claim by their followers is “oh, it’s just a strategy.” Who would follow a group with such a sick and deranged “strategy?” It is no strategy. It is their agenda, and it will only get increasingly more radical.
Here is another example of their increase in radicalization over the years. When the AC first started producing books, they were pro Buddhism, pro Hinduism, and pro psychedelics:
“The Illuminati’s religion is the most highly developed expression of Gnosticism and is called Illumination (alternatively, Illuminism). Dedicated to the pursuit of enlightenment, it has many parallels with the Eastern religions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. It rejects the Abrahamic religions of faith: Judaism, Christianity and Islam.” – Mike Hockney, The God Game
“High level research should go into finding and developing the safest, highest quality recreational drugs. Drug research should focus on ‘expanding the mind’.” – Michael Faust, The Case for Meritocracy
Contrast that with their later material that absolutely attacks followers of Buddhism and Hinduism as viciously as what is found in the contents of the quotes above:
“Fuck the Buddha, and fuck all Buddhists. Go kill yourselves. It’s not as if you would really be killing yourselves, since, according to your own beliefs, there is nothing there to kill!” – Mark Romel, The False Awakeners
“Buddhists: Dumb, Dumb, Dumb – Buddhism is for stupid narcissists who don’t have the guts or intelligence to be outright atheists, scientific materialists, or nihilists.” – Mark Romel, The False Awakeners
“So, Devil-worshiping Abrahamists make up 54.9% of humanity. Imagine humanity without this 54.9%. Wouldn’t everything be infinitely better? Now also imagine humanity without the Buddhists, Hindus, Taoists, Sikhs and the other religious types (28.8%). Would the remainder – the 16.3% plus the tiny fraction of hyperrationalists (Illuminists) be the basis of Higher Humanity? Humanity cannot go into the future until it rids itself of the past, i.e. mainstream religion, which still overwhelmingly dominates humankind.” – Mark Romel, The False Awakeners
Here’s what they have to say about psychedelics in one of their most recent books:
“When Terence McKenna took DMT and interacted with “machine elves” was that someone having an epiphany, or a psychotic episode? Aren’t most psychonauts basically simulating mental illness via drugs, then mistaking this for some breakthrough to a higher mental state? It’s amazing how mad experiences are often experienced numinously and with such emotional intensity that people think they are transcendent experiences. An enormous amount of human history has resulted from insane states being mistaken for the highest mystical states. Nearly all mystical intuition, embracing Eastern religion and New Ageism, revolves around serious derangement. The higher the derangement, the more credible the claims are taken to be. Gurus get nowhere by mentioning reason and logic. They have to talk about ineffable subjective states, and these incoherent states are of course just the states of severe mental illness!” – Rob Armstrong, Homo Roboticus
Why are they so opposed to psychedelics when some of the greatest philosophers, such as Plato, were likely inspired by psychedelics? Psychedelics allow you to experience the content associated with the very structure of reality, so why would they hate them with such passion? Because psychedelics remove conditioning.
Terence Mckenna said,
“Psychedelics are illegal not because a loving government is concerned that you may jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and culturally laid down models of behaviour and information processing. They open you up to the possibility that everything you know is wrong.” ― Terence McKenna
This stance against psychedelics has always been a major red flag to me as psychedelics have been indescribably helpful tools to view reality in new ways and make philosophical breakthroughs. They hate psychedelics because they are excellent at breaking down brainwashing.
Who they Are:
Do I believe the AC are literal Nazis? Not as traditionally defined. They occasionally criticize the Nazis and call Hitler a maniac.
Do I believe the AC are the Illuminati? No. They have never provided a shred of evidence for being the Illuminati, and I thought it was clear that story was abandoned when they switched to an angel mythos in the Jack Tanner series; however, they started up the Illuminati mythos later, but in a blander way.
I believe the evidence clearly shows that the AC are a new form of Nazism (or at the very least, greatly admire the Nazis and use their themes for radicalization and genocidal extermination) posing as the Illuminati. I believe they plan to systematically kill religious people in their “Final Solution of the Abrahamic Problem” and plan to do the same to groups associated with the LGBTQ+ community, such as trans and nonbinary people. They have explicitly revealed their genocidal intentions for the religious in their praise of emperor Hadrian, a novel praising the Nazis as heroes, and putting forth a “Final Solution.” They are planting the seeds for the extermination of members of the LGBTQ+ community and likely many other groups they despise such as the disabled community, those who follow eastern religion, New Agers, etc.
This is why they engage in clear conditioning tactics. They can’t come out and reveal their positions because they would have no followers.
If this is what they say publicly can you imagine what they haven’t said? Why do you think they never describe what the world they want to create will look like? It’s because no one in their right mind would accept it without intense conditioning. They seek to create a world where religious people are exterminated, and anyone who expresses themselves outside the “norm” are rounded up and put into camps. Their plan for the future is completely stripped of all life. They are “form “without any “content.” They have explicitly said they want to create a “God Factory.” The world they want is a lifeless, dull, grey, factory model of conformity and sameness. In the Sinclair book they outright say they want sameness and are opposed to diversity.
Their Deranged Lies:
The AC have made absolutely deranged claims throughout their books. Consider all their outrageous mythos about Archons and the Demiurge that they were serious about in their early work. They say Pythagoras reincarnates every 216 years:
“According to calculations, Pythagoras reincarnates every 216 years, and is due back in 2026 – the Nth Coming!” – Mike Hockney, The God Game
They also claim to have a Soul Camera that allows them to scan people’s souls and see how close they are to gnosis, that they have the holy grail that allows anyone who uses it to achieve instant gnosis and own a secret god helmet and talked about a secret war with the Brotherhood of the Shadows. When was the last time they mentioned any of that other than a passing mention? They used to talk about these topics constantly but obviously they dropped it. That anyone can take this seriously is unbelievable.
“All of the material in the books of the AC Project is of course concerned with the ten degrees of the Illuminati. If you have read every book and internalised the values they express, you are in a position to validly regard yourself as an Illuminatus. The Soul Camera is a device used on individuals. The ultimate aim is to have a global soul scanner, to reveal the state of the souls of everyone on earth…” Adam Weishaupt, Contra Mundum
Notice the above quote also includes another blatant conditioning tactic. Readers are told they must read every one of their books (at the time of that quote there were at least 40 and today there are somewhere around 200, with some of these books being longer than 800 pages.) Readers are told that they get to become an Illuminatus if they read and internalize every one of their books. Their conditioning tactics are everywhere and totally obvious to anyone with experience in spotting them. Are they saying to read books on critical thinking or to take a course in logic to be an Illuminatus? No. They are saying you should read all their books, which are filled with brainwashing dogma and hatred.
They even wrote a book about having sex with angels:
“How can angels – who are spirits – have sex with humans? They do it via possession. They take over certain human beings. Then their angelic nature, their much greater power and intelligence, causes the body to be radically enhanced and physically superior. – Jack Tanner, Sex With Angels
“Who were the “sons of God”? They were angels, and they mated with human females (“daughters of men”) to create a hybrid race of angel-humans (the Nephilim), some of whom are reputed to be still alive in the present day, and can be detected by a specific genetic test that is kept secret from the general public. What is sex with angels like? Is it the best sex of all, the most orgasmic? It’s said that once you go angel, you never go back to human.
In today’s world, which clubs and bars can you go to if you want to meet angels for casual sex? What are their sexual preferences, kinks and rituals? Are angels the leaders of the most exclusive secret societies? Did the movie Eyes Wide Shut depict an angelic sex rite? Is having sex with angels dangerous? Is there any truth behind the rumor that angels are obsessed with women’s hair, as St. Paul suggested? Did angels take retribution against immodest women, as some theologians indicated? Were angels violators and punishers of the most sexual women, the Delilahs and Jezebels of the world? Can angels acquire sexually transmitted diseases, or are they permanently immune? Is sex with angels the purest sex, or the dirtiest?” – Jack Tanner, Sex With Angels
This is obviously fabricated ridiculousness. In fact, the Angel Series was the series of books that came out when the God Series ended. The Illuminati is barely mentioned in this series, and I thought it was clear that the Illuminati mythos was dropped for another one. However, it seems like people hung on to the Illuminati mythos and they tried it again later. If that wasn’t insane enough, here is some more ludicrousness from the original AC website:
“Is it possible for a human being to be possessed by Satan? The idea has been explored in a number of horror films, but there’s a group working for the Old World Order that thinks it can be accomplished for real. They have identified twelve possible candidates, but, at the present time, the name of only one is known for sure: Supriem Rockefeller. It is said that he considers that he was born as Lucifer, but is now “redeemed” and in synch with the “Supriem” Being. (Contrary to Christian propaganda, Satan and Lucifer are two entirely different beings. Many of the greatest misunderstandings in history have come from wrongly equating the two. A Luciferian has nothing in common with a Satanist; the first is a follower of light and the latter a servant of darkness. The idea of Lucifer being “redeemed” is absurd. Only Satan is in need of redemption.) Supriem claims to see himself as a great benefactor, the long-foretold saviour destined to at last bring enlightenment to humanity. But it would come as no surprise for a Satanist to seek to disguise his true nature. Below, we have outlined the infinitely strange tale of Supriem Rockefeller. Is he mankind’s future Saviour or Destroyer? Or simply a fantasist, who, by moving in the right circles, has come across snippets of an ancient plan to bring Satan to earth and, to satisfy his narcissism, has decided to put himself in the frame. Judge for yourself.
The Old World Order sponsor a number of esoteric societies. One of the most sinister is The Brotherhood (or College) of the Shadows, once known as the Order of the Golem and composed of Jewish alchemists and Kabbalists. The golem is a creature composed of inanimate matter (a “clay being”), an automaton, which can allegedly be brought to life when a rabbi places in its mouth a piece of paper with the true name of God written upon it. In the world of magic, the true name of “God” is invoked when the most powerful spells of all are cast… Frankenstein, a being created from the body parts of corpses and then animated by a brilliant scientist, is a more modern tale of a golem. Dr Frankenstein could easily be based on a member of the Brotherhood of the Shadows, although there is no sure proof.
The ancient mission of the Brotherhood of the Shadows was to master every aspect of the golem and its interactions with humans. In modern times, they have become experts in artificial intelligence, cybernetics, the human genome, genetic engineering, cloning etc: every aspect of the “science of the double”. Many are elite scientists, being paid vast salaries. They desire to produce a perfect simulacrum of a human being, like the “replicants” of the film Blade Runner. Many of them see it as purely a scientific endeavour, but the higher ranks of the Brotherhood have very different aims.
They want to create
1) “Manchurian Candidates” (perfect, disposable assassins),
2) “doubles” to take the place of leaders in dangerous situations or to produce airtight alibis for leaders while they are engaging in nefarious activities elsewhere,
3) simulacra of soldiers who can be sent on the most dangerous missions,
4) doppelgangers for use in psy-ops against chosen targets (nothing is more psychologically disturbing than to suddenly encounter your own double),
5) young clones of old, dying members of the Old World Order into which their minds can be transferred so that they can be “reborn” in their prime.
…The Brotherhood refer to all copies of real human beings as “shadows”. (They themselves like to stand in the shadows, hence their name.) Some of them dream of an entire world of shadows over which they can exert complete mastery. The “New World Order”, in the mouths of these people, is a codename for the creation of this shadow world in which the unruly, uncooperative masses are replaced by their compliant, docile simulacra. It is the horrific vision of perfect and permanent control by the Old World Order, in which real humanity is no longer welcome to participate…
For the highest echelon of the Brotherhood of the Shadows, their task is the most sinister of all, but it is by no means a secret one. It is one long foretold and much discussed – to bring forth the “antichrist”, or even one level higher than that: Satan himself. The Brotherhood of the Shadows reached the peak of their powers between 1600 and 1793. They saved many prominent aristocrats from the guillotine in Revolutionary France by substituting them with doubles.
The most controversial case of all regarding substitution by a double was supposedly that of Jesus Christ at the Crucifixion, which the Brotherhood of the Shadows, led at the time by Joseph of Arimathea, was alleged to have organised…
As mainstream science grew ever stronger in the period 1800 to the present day, it was believed that the Brotherhood of the Shadows had either been dissolved or gone deep underground. Now, it is thought that they have re-emerged, having combined state-of-the-art science with their ancient occult skills, and they are being massively backed by the power and wealth of the Old World Order. Their leaders have been given carte blanche to focus on the darkest arts. This unholiest of alliances could scarcely be more disturbing…
What Ahmed doesn’t mention is that it’s possible to prevent a human from acquiring a soul. Certain black magicians have specialised in this “skill”. In the 1970s, the Brotherhood of the Shadows identified twelve possible candidates to host Satan. These twelve had to be born in particular circumstances. Renegade priests carried out black magic ceremonies to ensure that they were born without souls (because only soulless golems can be taken over by Satan). These “living corpses” seem to most people to be perfectly human, but they all exhibit a strange deadness of the eyes. (If eyes are the windows to the soul then what are the eyes like if there is no soul?) The Brotherhood are said to have reinforced the DNA of the potential hosts using “triple helix DNA”, to make them robust enough to host Satan’s soul without being destroyed. Satan, once he has become incarnate, will become the one-world leader, and the Great Tyranny will begin, much worse even than that of the Old World Order. Rex Mundi, the king of the world, the Demiurge himself, will be able to rule his creation in person before the coming of the Apocalypse…” – The AC
What is this insanity? It’s religious garbage. The AC authors will say anything. They have a book on using adrenochrome for accessing secret realities and another book that talks positively about Jesus Christ. They will say anything, yet people believe they are the Illuminati without a shred of evidence because that is the mythos they were exposed to first.
With the Illuminati mythos they have set themselves up as gods where people follow their orders without question and believe whatever they say. They constantly use the “appeal to authority” fallacy, and conditioning tactic by declaring themselves the smartest people in the world and the most powerful secret society in existence. This is nothing but a religion where their followers obey them unquestioningly. If they actually showed their faces no one would take them seriously.
Ask yourself, would the all-powerful Illuminati barely know how to set up a website, and spend all their days ranting and raving getting people on social media to troll others? Would they be reduced to having their only communication come from some random comedian’s Facebook page? This is an extreme case of cognitive dissonance for their followers. I am incredibly disappointed at those who have fallen for this, people I thought were rational.
Additionally, they have constantly said they were ending their project. They said they were ending it in 2015, but never did. They said they were ending it just recently on their website and at the end of “Without the Mob…” but then said they weren’t going anywhere days later. Their website is only down because it was blocked, likely for their illegal, dangerous, and harassing activity.
In 2015 they said:
“On November 2, 2015, the Day of the Dead, we deleted the AC site, with the exception of this page. It will never be returning.
This page will be removed on November 14, and replaced with a short commemoration to Leibniz, who died on that day. By the end of January 2016, the AC site will vanish entirely.”
“So, it’s the end of the AC era. It plainly outstayed its welcome. It’s time for new voices and visions. For new talents and new creations. Over to you…
With the death of the AC site, we have created the opportunity to get rid of all these ghastly people from the online movement once and for all.” – the AC
In 2022 they said:
“Light up, light up. Well, stick or twist? What will you do now? Are the fireworks over, or just beginning? Are you one of the Perfectibilists? Are you one of the Transformers? We are those who take no prisoners. This is your emergency broadcast system. Transmission ends here. The AC is dead. DO NOT RESUSCITATE. DO NOT RESUSCITATE.” – Sinclair, David. Without the Mob